Women can’t
afford to ignore their economic security. The majority of women work in low wage jobs. Six in ten
mothers are the primary or co-breadwinners for their families. Poverty is the
central fact of life for too many New Yorkers and it is time candidates for
political office recognized that fact and put forth realistic and concrete
ideas to address this critical truth.
A recent
Census Report looked at incomes, poverty rates, and access to health insurance. Overall, New York State ranks 35 out of 50
states. And things are getting worse for the most vulnerable families.
Data from 2017 indicates that financial progress for low-income Americans came
to a near halt during the first year of the Trump Administration.
Nearly half
of Americans have difficulty paying their bills; more than one-third have struggled
with hunger or having to forego needed medical treatment. The stark truth is
that a minimum-wage worker can’t afford a 2-bedroom apartment anywhere in the United States.
In fact, a one-bedroom is affordable for minimum-wage workers in only 22
counties in five states: Arizona, California, Colorado, Oregon and Washington.
These are all states with a higher minimum wages than the $7.25 federal wage.
The
evidence of the struggles American families face is everywhere. Recently credit
card defaults (the way too many people stretch too little wages over too
much month) went up by 10 percent over a similar time last year. More people
who borrowed to purchase an automobile have needed extra time to make their
payments. And for too many in rural New
York, public transportation does not exist and a
personal car is the only way to get to work.
Getting to
work is dependant upon affordable and available child care for most families
with young children. They can’t afford to worry about the quality of child care
when finding it and affording it can be nearly insurmountable problems. When it
comes to high child care costs, New
York is 48 out of 50 states in cost.
And those
low-wage jobs that have taken the place of many of the previous jobs in the
so-called “economic recovery” since the crash of 2008 are not the first step up
the economic ladder. They are, in fact, dead ends that trap employees in an
endless cycle of poverty.
"If you start in one of those low-wage occupations, you
have a higher probability of becoming unemployed than moving up the career
ladder," said Todd Gabe, a co-author of the paper, titled "Can
Low-Wage Workers Get Better Jobs?" In other words, a low-wage worker was
three times more likely to stop working altogether than to move to a better job
in a given year.
MIT
economist Peter Temin argues that escaping poverty takes almost 20 years with
nearly nothing going wrong. He agrees that education is the key, but for it to
be a pathway, you have to start out in grade school and proceed through high
school and college without any hiccups for you or your family. Not an easy
objective for anyone but the very wealthy.
And it is
not just the poorest Americans who suffer and fail to thrive. According to
Alissa Quart, “Middle-class life is now 30% more expensive than it was 20 years
ago.” She cites the costs of housing, education, health care and child care in
particular in her book, Squeezed: Why Our Families Can’t Afford America. She
writes, “In some cases the cost of daily life over the last 20 years has
doubled.”
There are
good paying jobs right now, but more than half of them exist in the high-tech
sector dominated by medical fields or computers. These are not fields the
average person can walk into without years of training and specialized study.
And the gender gap in the tech field is a barrier for too many women. Tech companies employ more than twice as many men as women.
The high
paying jobs of the future will continue to be in these fields by all
projections. How to ensure women are qualified for these good, high-wage jobs is an uphill
battle. Even finding a female STEM role model is a challenge. According to a
new study by the Geena Davis's Institute on Gender in Media at Mount Saint
Mary's University, in California,
the last decade has seen little progress in the way women are portrayed in
science and technology roles in film and television. That study found that 62.9
percent of STEM professionals portrayed in media are men, outnumbering women
STEM characters nearly two-to-one.
And as
Professor Temin suggests about the pathway out of poverty, the way to build
interest in STEM fields and the requisite jobs skills is a long-term prospect.
It will take an investment in time, talent, education and vision to correct
these deficits.
Political
leadership is a critical component.
Before you
go to the polls in 2018, spend some time exploring the issues the candidates
are talking about. If they are focusing on Culture War issues, force them
to talk about the issues that concern your economic future. Vote for your
economic security on November 6.
No comments:
Post a Comment